The destruction and damage to a seven-story Brooklyn apartment complex resulted from construction by CHESAKL Enterprises, Inc., a subcontractor hired by a nearby developer. The company violated New York City building codes and operated without a permit, causing severe and significant structural damage to an adjacent building and making it unsafe to live in.
The damage caused financial damage to the owner of the affected building, who also had difficulties in selling the land due to the damage. Lawsuit filed against CHESAKL Enterprises, IncIt took almost two years to fix it. At this point, construction stopped and the tenants were compensated at the expense of the development company.
This issue is due to CHESAKL Enterprises, Inc. being careless and unprofessional in their work, violating building codes and causing damage to a nearby building.
The security of our home is one of the most basic needs we have as human beings.It is human nature to want to return to a place of safety and relaxation after a hard day’s work. Unfortunately, for residents of the seven-story Brooklyn apartment complex, that was far from reality.
Problems began when CHESAKL Enterprises Inc., a company specializing in complex engineering projects, began construction work next to the apartment complex. Although the company claims to beconstructionprofessionals,itdoesnotcomplywith New York Citybuildingcodes. The result was a series of unresolved issues for tenants and residents of the complex.
The CHESAKL Enterprises website describes the company as specializing in theprocessingof steel materials, whichrequires highly skilled steelworkers and innovative processing equipment.However, this description did not protect the company from violating building codes,working without a permit and even destroyingnearby buildings in illegal activities. These actions resultedin a two-year legal battle, construction freezes, and compensation from the company to the affected tenants.
It is shocking that a company claiming to be a team of professionals specializing in complex engineering projects canignore such comprehensive regulations and cause so much harm and inconvenience to localresidents.This situation underlines the need for companies to take responsibility for their actions and complywith the applicable legal framework to protect the safety and well-being of citizens.
According to a recent lawsuit filed in the New York State Supreme Court, Yury Grobshteyn, the owner of a seven-story apartment complex in Brooklyn, is suffering from a failed construction project adjacent to his property.The project, which involved thedemolitionof an existing building and theconstructionof a new eight-story complex, was carried out by thedeveloper’s subcontractor, CHESAKL Enterprises, Inc.
Unfortunately for Grobshteyna, the contractordid not havepermission to enter his property and was negligent in clearing the siteat the property line between Grobshteyna’ssite and the new building under construction. As a result, theGrobshteynBuilding and itsadjoining structures suffered significant and severe structural damage, including visible cracks in the walls and collapsed ceilings. Such structural integrity violations can lead to accidents and even building collapses, posing a serious safety threat to
tenants and bystanders.
Whatis particularly worrying about this situation is that asingleassessment can only revealnumerousdefects and inconsistencies. Luckily,inthisparticularcase, the damage was too visible to ignore.In addition to the visible damage, Grobshteyn also says construction work on anearby building damaged and ruptured the drainage system, rendering itunusable.
This situation caused several tenants to move outofpremisesinanearbydevelopmentzone.Owners like Grobshteyn are atestament to the resilience and adaptability of the New York market. The situation is also a reminder of the need for caution and diligence when implementingany construction project,particularly in NewYork’shighly competitive and high-risk real estate market.
In a disturbing turn of events, realestate owner Yury Grobshteyn is unable to sell his Brooklyn apartment complex becauseof alleged damage to the building.Despite numeroussalesattempts, the proposed offersprovedillegitimate and were rejected, resulting in a loss of rental income and financial difficulties for Grobshteyn. Adding fuel to the fire, Grobshteyn accused the building’s owner of trying to frame him with false claimsfordamages.
CHESAKL ENTERPRISES 